ojs2 has produced an error Message: WARNING: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() In file: /home/jab1/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/core/Core.inc.php At line: 149 Stacktrace: File: /home/jab1/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/core/Core.inc.php line 149 Function: PKPApplication->errorHandler(2, "Invalid argument supplied for foreach()", "/home/jab1/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/core/Core.inc.php", 149, Array(6)) File: /home/jab1/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/core/PKPRequest.inc.php line 463 Function: Core->isUserAgentBot("Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)") File: /home/jab1/public_html/plugins/generic/usageEvent/UsageEventPlugin.inc.php line 353 Function: PKPRequest->isBot() File: /home/jab1/public_html/plugins/generic/usageEvent/UsageEventPlugin.inc.php line 106 Function: UsageEventPlugin->_buildUsageEvent("TemplateManager::display", Array(5)) File: (unknown) line (unknown) Function: UsageEventPlugin->getUsageEvent("TemplateManager::display", Array(5)) File: /home/jab1/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/plugins/HookRegistry.inc.php line 89 Function: call_user_func(Array(2), "TemplateManager::display", Array(5)) File: /home/jab1/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/template/PKPTemplateManager.inc.php line 332 Function: HookRegistry->call("TemplateManager::display", Array(5)) File: /home/jab1/public_html/pages/article/ArticleHandler.inc.php line 224 Function: PKPTemplateManager->display("article/article.tpl") File: (unknown) line (unknown) Function: ArticleHandler->view(Array(1), Object(Request)) File: /home/jab1/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/core/PKPRouter.inc.php line 362 Function: call_user_func(Array(2), Array(1), Object(Request)) File: /home/jab1/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/core/PKPPageRouter.inc.php line 220 Function: PKPRouter->_authorizeInitializeAndCallRequest(Array(2), Object(Request), Array(1), False) File: /home/jab1/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/core/Dispatcher.inc.php line 134 Function: PKPPageRouter->route(Object(Request)) File: /home/jab1/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/core/PKPApplication.inc.php line 178 Function: Dispatcher->dispatch(Object(Request)) File: /home/jab1/public_html/index.php line 64 Function: PKPApplication->execute() Server info: OS: Linux PHP Version: 5.6.40-38+ubuntu18.04.1+deb.sury.org+1 Apache Version: N/A DB Driver: mysql DB server version: 5.7.33-0ubuntu0.16.04.1-log
Does Incentives Schemes and Working Relationship Affect Auditor Whistleblowing Intention? | Mapuasari | Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis

Does Incentives Schemes and Working Relationship Affect Auditor Whistleblowing Intention?

Supeni Anggraeni Mapuasari, Gading Anindita Rusliadi, Vita Elisa Fitriana

##article.abstract##


Whistleblowing is one of the key oversight mechanisms in response to many corporate financial scandals. This mechanism aids in the upkeep of qualified audit methods and judgment in the public accounting firm. Workplace relationships and incentive programs may have an impact on auditors' intentions to report misconduct. This research is one of the few that tests experimentally whether workplace relationship and incentive programs can increase the influence of the desire to disclose fraudulent financial reporting. This study makes use of 60 final-year students who have worked as interns at public accounting firms, utilizing the true experimental-post-test control design method. The data was analysed with ANOVA test by utilizing 2x2 experimental design. The presence of incentive awards was found to positively correlate with auditors' propensity to report misconduct. The relationship between incentives to whistleblowing intention getting stronger when the working relationship between the whistle-blower to the reported senior is close. The findings contain important implications to enrich literature and practical contribution towards whistleblowing discussion.

Whistleblowing adalah salah satu mekanisme pengawasan utama dalam menanggapi banyak skandal keuangan perusahaan. Mekanisme ini membantu dalam pemeliharaan metode audit yang berkualitas dan penilaian di kantor akuntan publik. Hubungan di tempat kerja dan program insentif dapat berdampak pada niat auditor untuk melaporkan pelanggaran. Penelitian ini adalah salah satu dari sedikit yang menguji secara eksperimental apakah hubungan di tempat kerja dan program insentif dapat meningkatkan pengaruh keinginan untuk mengungkapkan kecurangan pelaporan keuangan. Responden dalam penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa tahun terakhir yang pernah menjalankan magang di kantor akuntan publik. Dengan mempergunakan metode eksperimen tulen post-test, penelitian ini mengujikan pengaruh antar variabel dengan alat statistic ANOVA berdesain 2x2. Keberadaan program insentif secara empiris berpengaruh positif dalam meningkatkan intensi whistle blowing. Hubungan ini semakin kuat saat pelapor dan terlapor memiliki kedekatan hubungan kerja. Temuan riset ini menarik dan dapat memperkaya kajian literatur dan praktik terkait whistle blowing di dunia audit.

##article.subject##


Whistleblowing;Incentive Schemes;Working Relationship;Whistleblowing Intention

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andon, P., Free, C., Jidin, R., Monroe, G. S., & Turner, M. J. (2018). The Impact of Financial Incentives and Perceptions of Seriousness on Whistleblowing Intention. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3215-6

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research. Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Betri, Murwaningsih, E. 2021. The Influence of Moral Character and Ethical Awareness of Internal Auditor toward Internal Audit Effectiveness with Whistleblowing System as Moderating Variable. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia (REAKSI). Vo. 6. No.1

Brink, A. G., Lowe, D. J., & Victoravich, L. M. (2013). The effect of evidence strength and internal rewards on intentions to report fraud in the dodd-frank regulatory environment. Auditing, 32(3), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50449

Boo, E., Ng, T. B. P., & Shankar, P. G. (2016). Effects of incentive scheme and working relationship on whistle-blowing in an audit setting. Auditing, 35(4), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-5148

Chang, Y., Wilding, M., & Shin, M. C. (2017). Determinants of Whistleblowing Intention: Evidence from the South Korean Government. Public Performance and Management Review, 40(4), 676–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1318761

Cleary, M., Walter, G., & Jackson, D. (2014). Above all, ‘do no harm’: Key considerations when including students as research participants in higher education settings. Contemporary Nurse, 49(1), 93–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2014.11081958

Delfgaauw, J., Dur, R., & Souverijn, M. (2020). Team incentives, task assignment, and performance: A field experiment. Leadership Quarterly, 31(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.003

Deloitte, P. A. F. (2023). Whistleblower Service: Report workplace misconduct. Deloitte.Com. https://www2.deloitte.com/be/en/pages/risk/articles/whistleblower-service.html

Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2011). Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the “Narrow Data Base.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1498843

Dungan, J., & Waytz, A. (2009). The Psychology of Whistleblowing.

Farooqi, S., Abid, G., & Ahmed, A. (2017). How bad it is to be good: Impact of organizational ethical culture on whistleblowing (the ethical partners). Arab Economic and Business Journal, 12(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aebj.2017.06.001

Fung, M. K. (2015). Cumulative Prospect Theory and Managerial Incentives for Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12074

Halpin, L., & Dundon, T. (2017). Whistle-blowing and the employment relations implications of the ‘Protected Disclosures Act 2014’ in the Republic of Ireland. The Irish Journal of Management, 36(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijm-2017-0009

Jubb, P. B. (1999). Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and

Interpretation. 77–94.

Mansor, T.M.T, Ariff, A.M., Ngah, A.H., Hashim, H.A. 2022. Religiosity and External Whistleblowing Intention. Asian Journal of Business & Accounting. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol15no2.4

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

Kajtazi, M., Cavusoglu, H., Benbasat, I., & Haftor, D. (2018). Escalation of Commitment as an Antecedent to Noncompliance with Information Security Policy. Information and Computer Security, 26(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-09-2017-0066

Kyu Wang, T., Fu, K. J., & Yang, K. (2018). Do Good Workplace Relationships Encourage Employee Whistle-Blowing? Public Performance and Management Review, 41(4), 768–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1464935

Latan, H., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. (2021). To Blow or Not to Blow the Whistle: The Role of Rationalization in the Perceived Seriousness of Threats and

Wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 517–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04287-5

Lee, G., & Fargher, N. L. (2018). The role of the audit committee in their oversight of whistle-blowing. Auditing, 37(1), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51769

Lee, G., & Turner, M. J. (2017). Do government administered financial rewards undermine firms’ internal whistle-blowing systems? A pitch. Accounting Research Journal, 30(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-07-2016-0087

Nahartyo, E. (2012). Desain dan Implementasi Riset Eksperimen.

Park, J. E., & Deitz, G. D. (2006). The effect of working relationship quality on salesperson performance and job satisfaction: Adaptive selling behavior in Korean automobile sales representatives. Journal of Business Research, 59(2), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.002

Pratolo, S., Sadjiman, V.P, Sofyani, H. 2020. Determinants of Whistleblowing Intention of Employees in Universities: Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia.

Priantara, D. (2017). Ketika Skandal Fraud Akuntansi Menerpa British Telecom dan PwC. Wartaekonomi.Co.Id. https://wartaekonomi.co.id/read145257/ketika-skandal-fraud-akuntansi-menerpa-british-telecom-dan-pwc

Pope, K. R., & Lee, C. C. (2013). Could the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 be Helpful in Reforming Corporate America? An Investigation on Financial Bounties and Whistle-Blowing Behaviors in the Private Sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(4), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1560-7

Schmidt, M. (2005). “Whistle blowing” regulation and accounting standards enforcement in Germany and Europe - An economic perspective. International Review of Law and Economics, 25(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2005.06.001

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. In: A critical assessment of our assumptions. Quasi-experimentation. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin. Houghton Mifflin Company. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2005.s22

Smaili, N., & Arroyo, P. (2019). Categorization of Whistleblowers Using the Whistleblowing Triangle. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3663-7

Supriyadi, & Prasetyaningsih, N. U. (2021). The role of moral reasoning on the effects of incentive schemes and working relationships on whistleblowing: An audit experimental study. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 23(3), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.64394

Suyatno, B. (2020). A whistleblowing culture. Insinde Indonesia. https://www.insideindonesia.org/archive/articles/a-whistleblowing-culture

Tuan Mansor, T. M., Mohamad Ariff, A., Hashim, H. A., & Ngah, A. H. (2022). External whistleblowing intentions of auditors: a perspective based on stimulus–organism–response theory. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 22(4), 871–897. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2021-0116

Verbruggen, F., & McLaren, R. (2018). Effects of reward and punishment on the interaction between going and stopping in a selective stop-change task. Psychological Research, 82(2), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0827-5

Waytz, A., Dungan, J., & Young, L. (2013). The whistleblower’s dilemma and the fairness-loyalty tradeoff. Journal of Experimental Social. Psychology, 49(6), 1027–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.07.002

Werbel, J. D., & DeMarie, S. M. (2005). Aligning strategic human resource management and person-environment fit. Human Resource Management Review, 15(4), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.10.001

Werbel, J. D., & Johnson, D. J. (2001). The use of person-group fit for employment selection: A missing link in person-environment fit. Human Resource Management, 40(3), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.1013

Tversky, A. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory : Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.

Uly, Y. A., & Djumena, E. (2023). 3287 Pengaduan Masuk di Sistem Whistleblower Kemenkeu, 550 Kena Hukuman Disiplin. Kompas.Com. https://money.kompas.com/read/2023/03/12/081000826/3.287-pengaduan-masuk-di-sistem-whistleblower-kemenkeu-550-pegawai-kena

Xu, Y., Liu, K., Chen, K., & Feng, M. (2023). How Does Person-Environment Fit Relate to Career Calling? The Role of Psychological Contracts and Organizational Career Management. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16(May), 1597–1614. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S40437

Zheng, B. Z., Patel, C., & Evans, E. (2019). The influence of construal of self on internal auditors’ judgments on whistle-blowing: Evidence from China. International Journal of Auditing, 23(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12146x




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jab.v23i2.1155

Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis (JAB)
ISSN 1412-0852 (print), 2580-5444 (online)
Published by Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia


Creative Commons License
JAB on http://jab.fe.uns.ac.id/index.php/jab is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Visitor Statistic