Email this article Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penilaian Auditor Eksternal atas Risiko Kecurangan
##article.abstract##
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Pengaruh skeptisme profesional terhadap penilaian auditor eksternal atas risiko kecurangan (2) Pengaruh independensi terhadap penilaian auditor eksternal atas risiko kecurangan (3) Pengaruh narsisme klien terhadap penilaian auditor eksternal atas risiko kecurangan (4) Pengaruh tekanan waktu terhadap penilaian auditor eksternal atas risiko kecurangan. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode survey dengan kuesioner kepada auditor yang bekerja di certified public accountant (CPA) di Semarang dan Yogyakarta. Total responden penelitian ini sebanyak 48 auditor. Alat statistik yang digunakan untuk menguji hipotesis adalah regresi berganda dengan bantuan software smartPLS 3.0. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa variabel skeptisme profesional dan tekanan waktu memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap penilaian auditor eksternal atas risiko kecurangan, sedangkan variabel narsisme klien dan independensi tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap penialaian auditor eksternal atas risiko kecurangan
This study aims to determine: (1) Effect of skepticism professional on the external auditor's assessment of the risk of fraud (2) The effect of the independence on the external auditor's assessment of the risk of fraud (3) Effect of narcissism client on the external auditor's assessment of the risk of fraud (4) The effect of time pressure on the external auditor's assessment of the risk of fraud This research was conducted by survey method with questionnaires to auditors who work in Certified Public Accountant (CPA) contained in Semarang and Yogyakarta. Total respondents of this study amounted to 48 auditors. The statistical tool used to test the hypothesis is to use multiple regression with the help of software SmartPLS 3.0. Results from this study showed that professional skepticism variables and the time pressure has a significant influence on the external auditor's assessment of the risk of fraud, while variable narcissism client and independence did not significantly affect the external auditors on the assessment of risk of fraud.
##article.subject##
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adnyani, N., Atmadja, A.T., & Herawati, N.T., (2014). Pengaruh skeptisme profesional auditor, independensi, dan pengalaman auditor terhadap tanggungjawab auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan dan kekeliruan laporan keuangan (Studi kasus pada Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) wilayah Bali). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi Undiksha, 2(1).
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Akbar, Z. (2008). Persepsi auditor independen terhadap efektivitas red flags dalam mendeteksi fraud pada pelaporan keuangan. Yogyakarta: s.n.
American Institute of Certified Pubic Accountants. (2002). Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. New York: American Institute of Certified Pubic Accountants.
Anggriawan, E.F., (2014). Pengaruh pengalaman kerja, skeptisme profesional dan tekanan waktu terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi fraud (Studi empiris pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di DIY). Jurnal Nominal, 3(2).
Arens, A.A., Elder, R.J., & Beasley, M.S. (2014). Auditing and assurance services: An integrated approach (edisi kelima belas). USA: Pearson.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2015). The fraud tree. Diakses pada http://www.acfe.com/fraud-tree.aspx.
Bennett, G.B., & Hatfield, R.C. (2013). The effect of the social mismatch between staff auditors and client management on the collection of audit evidence. Accounting Review, 88(1), 31–50.
Campbell, W.K., Goodie, A.S., & Foster, J.D. (2004). Narcissism, confidence, and risk attitude. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17(4), 297–311.
Cohen, J.R., Dalton, D.W., & Harp, L.N. (2014). The effect of professional skepticsm on job attitudes and turnoverintentions within the audit profession. Diakses dari http://ssrn.com/abstract=2410547.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia (Edisi keempat). Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Fauziah, R. (2010). Pengaruh time budget pressure terhadap kualitas hasil audit (Skripsi). UNIKOM.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading MA: Addison Wesley.
Fransiska, I.P. (2015). Pengaruh skeptisme personal dan skeptisme situasional (client-specific experiences) terhadap keputusan audit (Skripsi). Universitas Gadjah Mada, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Yogyakarta.
Frijda, N.H. (1987). Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendency. Cognition and Emotion, 1(2), 115–143.
Fullerton, R.R., & Durtschi, C. (2005). The effect of professional skepticism on the fraud detection skills of internal auditors. Utah State University, 435, 1–38.
Furtner, M.R., Rauthmann, J.F., & Sachse, P. (2011). The self-loving self-leader: An examination of the relationship between self-leadership and the dark triad. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 39(3), 369–379.
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial least squares konsep, teknik dan aplikasi menggunakan program smartpls 3.0 untuk penelitian empiris. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
Gunawan, L.D. (2012). Pengaruh tingkat independensi, kompetensi, obyektivitas, dan integritas auditor terhadap kualitas audit yang dihasilkan kantor akuntan publik di Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 1(4), 33-57.
Hammersley, J.S. (2011). A review and model of auditor judgments in fraud-related planning tasks. Auditing, 30(4), 101–128.
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2001). Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Institut Akutan Publik Indonesia. (2011). Standar profesional akuntan publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
Johnson, E.N., Jr, J.R.K., Apostolou, B.A., & Hassel, J.M. (2013). Auditor perceptions of client narcissism as a fraud attitude risk factor. Auditing, 32(1), 203–219.
Lind, D.A., Marchal, W.G., & Wathen, S.A. (2008). Statistical techniques in business and economics with GLOBAL DATA SETS (13th ed.). USA: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Mautz, R.K., & Sharaf, H.A. (1961). The philosophy of auditing. Florida: American Accounting Association.
Morf, C.C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177–196.
Moyes, G.D., (2008). CPAs’ perceptions of red flags used in detecting fraud. The ICFAI Journal of Audit Practice, 5(1), 47-60.
Mulyadi. (2002). Auditing. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Nugraha, M.E. (2012). Pengaruh independensi, kompetensi, dan profesionalisme terhadap kualitas audit. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 1(4), 4–11.
Paulhus, D.L., & Williams, K.M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563.
Popova, V. (2013). Exploration of skepticism, client-specific experiences, and audit judgments. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(2), 140–160.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2008). Report on the PCAOB’s 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 inspections of domestic annually inspected firms. PCAOB Release No. 2008-008, 1-28.
Puspitasari, L.A. (2013). Pengaruh tekanan anggaran waktu, independensi dan sikap skeptisme profesional auditor terhadap kualitas audit dan pengaruhnya terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi fraud (Skripsi). Universitas Islam Indonesia, Fakultas Ekonomi, Yogyakarta.
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principle-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890-902).
Rusyanti, R. (2010). Pengaruh sikap skeptisme auditor, profesionalisme auditor dan tekanan anggaran waktu terhadap kualitas auditor (Skripsi). Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Jakarta.
Schilit, H., & Perler, J. (2010). Financial shenanigans: How to detect accounting gimmicks & fraud in financial reports (3rd ed.). New York: Mcgraw-hill.
Sengur, E.D. (2012). Auditors perception of fraud prevention measures: Evidence from Turkey. Annales Universitatis Apulentis Series Oeconomica , 14(1), 128-138.
Siregar, S.V., & Tenoyo, B. (2015). Fraud awareness survey of private sector in Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 22(3), pp.329–346.
Smith, M., Omar, N.H., Idris, S.I.Z., & Baharuddin, I. (2005). Auditors’ perception of fraud risk indicators Malaysian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(1), 73-86.
Sososutikno, C. (2003). Hubungan tekanan anggaran waktu dengan perilaku disfungsional serta pengaruhnya terhadap kualitas audit. Paper dipresentasikan pada acara Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VI, Surabaya
Supramono & Utami, I. (2004). Desain proposal penelitian akuntansi dan keuangan. Yogyakarta: ANDI.
Syahputra, B.E. (2012). Pengaruh kompetensi auditor, skeptisme profesional, pengalaman, keahlian audit, gender dan independensi terhadap ketepatan pemberian opini auditor (Skripsi). Universitas Islam Indonesia, Fakultas Ekonomi, Yogyakarta.
Tjun, L.T., Marpaung, E.I., & Setiawan, S. (2012). Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Independensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Akuntansi, 4(1), 33–56.
Tuanakotta, T.M. (2014). Audit berbasis ISA. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Utomo, A.S., 2014. Persepsi auditor eksternal pemerintah terhadap efektivitas red flags dalam mendeteksi fraud pada pengadaan barang/jasa. Yogyakarta: s.n.
Vona, L.W., (2008). Fraud risk assessment: Building a fraud audit program (1st ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Winardi, D.R., & Permana, Y. (2015). Pengaruh skeptisme profesional dan narsisme klien terhadap penilaian auditor eksternal atas risiko kecurangan. Paper dipresentasikan pada acara Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVIII, Medan
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jab.v17i2.248
Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis (JAB)
ISSN 1412-0852 (print), 2580-5444 (online)
Published by Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
JAB on http://jab.fe.uns.ac.id/index.php/jab is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License