Email this article Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris: Pengaruh Dewan Wanita terhadap Kebijakan Dividen di Indonesia
##article.abstract##
Some of institutional specificities of emerging economies is market uncertainty may increase agency problems that raise doubts about future cash flows such as dividend payments. This research aim to analyze the impact of board gender diversity on dividend payments in Indonesia. This research using the dataset of listed firms from Indonesia Stock Exchange over the period 2013-2016. This research is a quantitative research with purposive sampling method. The dividend payment was measured with Dividend Payout Ratio (DIVPR). The evidence indicating that women directors is negatively related to dividend payment, while women commissioners has positive impact. Moreover, we find that women independent directors and women independent commissioners does not have an effect on dividend payments. The sample in this study is limited because the payment of dividends is not an obligation and women are still a minority on board.
Beberapa kekhususan institusi negara berkembang adalah ketidakpastian pasar yang dapat meningkatkan masalah keagenan sehingga timbul keraguan tentang arus kas masa depan seperti pembayaran dividen. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh keragaman gender terhadap pembayaran dividen di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan data perusahaan yang terdaftar dari Bursa Efek Indonesia selama periode 2013-2016. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode purposive sampling. Pembayaran dividen diukur dengan Dividend Payout Ratio (DIVPR). Bukti menunjukkan bahwa direktur wanita berpengaruh negatif terhadap pembayaran dividen, sementara komisaris wanita memiliki pengaruh positif. Selain itu, direktur independen wanita dan komisaris independen wanita tidak berpengaruh pada pembayaran dividen. Sampel dalam penelitian ini terbatas karena pembayaran dividen bukanlah suatu keharusan dan wanita masih merupakan minoritas di jajaran dewan.
##article.subject##
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, R.B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact of governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.
Adams, R.B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter?. Management science, 58(2), 219-235.
Adams, R.B., Hermalin., & Weisbach. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), pages 58-107.
Amason, A.C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of management journal, 39(1), 123-148.
Amidu., J.A. (2006). Determinants of dividend payout ratios in Ghana. The Journal of Risk Finance, 7(2), 136 – 145.
Andrés, P., Arranz-Aperte, L., & Rodriguez-Sanz, J,A. (2017). Independent versus non-independent outside directors in European companies: Who has a say on CEO compensation?. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 20(2), 79-95.
Ang, J., Fatemi, A., & Tourani-Rad, A. (1997). Capital structure and dividend policies of Indonesian firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 5(1), 87-103.
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207-221.
Ben-Nasr, H. (2015). Government ownership and dividend policy: Evidence from newly privatized firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 42(5), 665–704.
Bermig, A., & Frick, B. (2010). Board size, board composition, and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Germany. Diakses dari https://ssrn.com/abstract=1623103
Byoun, S., Chang, K., & Kim, Y.S. (2016). Does corporate board diversity affect corporate payout policy?. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 45(1), 48-101.
Cabo, R., Gimeno, R., & Nieto, M. (2012). Gender Diversity on European Banks’ Boards of Directors. Journal of Business Ethics 109, 145-162
Chen, G., Liu, C., & Tjosvold, D. (2005). Conflict management for effective top management teams and innovation in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 277-300.
Chen, J., Leung, W.S., & Goergen, M. (2017). The impact of board gender composition on dividend payouts. Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 86-105.
Darmadi, S. (2013). Do women in top management affect firm performance? Evidence from Indonesia. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 13(3), 288–304.
Eckel, C.C. & Grossman, P.J. 2008. Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Handbook of experimental economics results, 1(113), 1061-1073.
Erhardt, N.L., Werbel, J.D., & Shrader, C.B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate governance: An international review, 11(2), 102-111.
Ferry, K. (2016). Diversity Scorecard 2016 : Building Diversity In Asia Pasific Boardroom.
Fombrun, C.J., & Pan, M. (2006). Corporate reputations in China: How do consumers feel about companies?. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(3), 165-170.
Gul, F.A., Srinidhi, B., & Ng, A.C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices?. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 314-338.
Gutiérrez, M., & Sáez, M. (2013). Deconstructing independent directors. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 13(1), 63-94.
Hillman, A.J., Cannella, A.A.,& Paetzold, R.L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management studies, 37(2): 235–256.
Hillman, A.J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A.A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941–952.
Hillman, A.J., Cannella Jr, A.A., & Harris, I.C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: how do directors differ?. Journal of Management ,28, 747.
Holmstrom, B., & Milgrom, P. (1994). The Firm as an incentive system. The American Economic Review, 84(4), 972-991.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). The theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal Finance and Economic, 3, 305–360.
Jensen, M.C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
Kusumastuti, S., Supatmi, S., & Sastra, P. (2008). Pengaruh board diversity terhadap nilai perusahaan dalam perspektif corporate governance. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 9(2), 88-98.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.W. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1–33.
Mather, M., & Lighthall, N.R. (2012). Risk and reward are processed differently in decisions made under stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 36-41.
Prasanna, P.K. (2014). Firm–level governance quality and dividend decisions: evidence from India. International Journal of Corporate Governance, 5(3), 197–222.
Probohudono, A.N., Tower, G., & Rusmin, R. (2013). Risk disclosure
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jab.v18i1.267
Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis (JAB)
ISSN 1412-0852 (print), 2580-5444 (online)
Published by Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
JAB on http://jab.fe.uns.ac.id/index.php/jab is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License